FoodLegal can alleviate areas of stress for our clients, help manage pain-points, relieve bottlenecks in supply chains, manage risks, and streamline processes to get more products more quickly to customers.
Our consulting services, compliance risk mitigation support tools and training courses have been adapted to meet the changing market conditions and provide flexibility in meeting increased product demand.
Australia's premier periodical in food law and policy issues. It focuses specifically on analysis and commentary for regulatory compliance and the legal issues affecting food and food industry participants
free
A summary of developments in food law in Australia and internationally for the month of September 2025
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has initiated numerous enforcement actions against businesses throughout 2025 regarding online representations and claims. This article examines key risk areas to consider when selling online, and outlines tips for businesses when developing and rolling out their online marketing.
While Australia and New Zealand share a bi-national regulatory framework for foods ‘on paper’, there are several important carve-outs and deviations where New Zealand has elected to implement its own specific standards. Now, with the introduction of separate standards for infant formula products in Australia and New Zealand, we again ask: Do we still have a bi-national food framework? In this article, we examine the history of joint food regulation between Australia and New Zealand, and some of the important current carve-outs from the bi-national approach, and what this means for businesses selling our sourcing foods in Australia and New Zealand.
The Australian Office of Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) and Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) both have involvement in regulating gene technology but do so completely separately in different parts of the food supply chain for food sold in the Australian market. The OGTR determines if a genetically modified organism (GMO) is safe to be released into the environment and regulates activities such as growing GM crops. FSANZ, on the other hand, engages in an extensive approval process and food safety assessment whenever a new GMO is proposed for use in food for human consumption. This article compares the separate processes of the two regulatory bodies and the implications these have on food business compliance obligations, as well as the impact in the strangest ways, such as an impact on eligibility to make a country of origin claim, as illustrated in this article.
SIGN UP NOW TO JOIN OUR FREE BULLETIN NEWSLETTER MAILING LIST FOR REGULAR UPDATES OR LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS TO ACCESS ALL BULLETIN ARTICLES TODAY
FoodLegal specialises in food law consultancy, compliance risk management, certification of product compliance integrity for food and beverage products and other allied products
We advise Australia's largest food companies, international brands, as well as small-to-medium sized enterprises and startups.
Our team of lawyers and consultants represent food manufacturers, importers, distributors, brand marketers, retailers, industry associations and groups.
We also work with clients from allied fields such as complementary medicines, life sciences, agribusiness and farmer-producers.
FoodLegal recognised by Australasian Lawyer as the Top Boutique Firm for 2024 in FMCG Law
Give your team a mastery of food compliance and risk management. Streamline your development and compliance processes with our legal and scientific hands-on experience. Dynamic, easy-to-understand legal commentary. All the benefits of having FoodLegal lawyers in-house.
At FoodLegal we believe that education is crucial to keeping your competitive edge.